> On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 11:41:07AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > And very gameable of course. James proposal at least has the advantage of
> > simplicity, of drawing from a rough set of relevant people (far from
> > perfectly) and a certain amount of random changeover according to the KS
> > of the year
> >
> > I would make only one change personally - extend an email vote to the
> > people on the final invite list who can't for various reasons make it.
>
> That's not what you said last year ...
>
http://thunk.org/pipermail/ksummit-2006-discuss/2006-July/000665.html