Re: [PATCH] memchr (trivial) optimization

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...>
Cc: Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@...>, lode leroy <lode_leroy@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Thursday, August 23, 2007 - 10:19 pm

On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 06:03:29PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:

Indeed. I'm just pointing out the general optimization of walking
one counter instead of two.

Hmm, perhaps the culprit is validate_nla?

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] memchr (trivial) optimization, lode leroy, (Wed Aug 22, 5:34 am)
Re: [PATCH] memchr (trivial) optimization, Ingo Oeser, (Wed Aug 22, 8:13 pm)
Re: [PATCH] memchr (trivial) optimization, Matt Mackall, (Thu Aug 23, 8:13 pm)
Re: [PATCH] memchr (trivial) optimization, Jan Engelhardt, (Fri Aug 24, 8:54 am)
Re: [PATCH] memchr (trivial) optimization, Matt Mackall, (Fri Aug 24, 11:57 am)
Re: [PATCH] memchr (trivial) optimization, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Thu Aug 23, 9:03 pm)
Re: [PATCH] memchr (trivial) optimization, Matt Mackall, (Thu Aug 23, 10:19 pm)
Re: [PATCH] memchr (trivial) optimization, Andi Kleen, (Wed Aug 22, 6:56 am)