* Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
quoted text > Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> writes:
> >
> > Is the -fno-omit-frame-pointer still required for some reason, or is
> > this a relict that could be removed?
>
> It's needed so that the WCHAN /proc display can backtrace one level up
> out of schedule()
it's not just one level - we'll back out until we are in scheduler
functions (up to 16 levels). So it will back out of io_schedule() and
other functions as well.
Ingo
-
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: sched.c: why -fno-omit-frame-pointer? , Ingo Molnar , (Thu Aug 23, 4:30 am)