Re: sched.c: why -fno-omit-frame-pointer?

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Andreas Schwab <schwab@...>, Alan Modra <alan@...>, David Mosberger-Tang <davidm@...>
Date: Thursday, August 23, 2007 - 7:30 am

* Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:


it's not just one level - we'll back out until we are in scheduler 
functions (up to 16 levels). So it will back out of io_schedule() and 
other functions as well.

	Ingo
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
sched.c: why -fno-omit-frame-pointer?, Adrian Bunk, (Sun Aug 19, 10:17 am)
Re: sched.c: why -fno-omit-frame-pointer?, Andi Kleen, (Sun Aug 19, 7:00 pm)
Re: sched.c: why -fno-omit-frame-pointer?, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Aug 23, 7:30 am)
Re: sched.c: why -fno-omit-frame-pointer?, Arjan van de Ven, (Sun Aug 19, 5:05 pm)