On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 10:22:59AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:The reasons for this may be obvious with more understanding of how the TAB came into existence, but given that the Linux Foundation isn't limited to kernel development (see the desktop architects stuff, for instance) it seems a bit odd for it to have a technical board that's determined at a kernel-only event. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org -
| Chuck Ebbert | Wanted: simple, safe x86 stack overflow detection |
| Alan Cox | Re: ndiswrapper and GPL-only symbols redux |
| Yinghai Lu | [PATCH 03/42] x86: remove irq_vectors_limits |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
git: | |
| しらいしななこ | Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.5.4 |
| Jan Wielemaker | git filter-branch --subdirectory-filter, still a mistery |
| Pierre Habouzit | [PATCH] guilt(1): Obvious bashisms fixed. |
| Christopher Faylor | Re: First cut at git port to Cygwin |
| Thilo Pfennig | OpenBSD project goals |
| Marco Peereboom | Re: Real men don't attack straw men |
| Daniel Hazelton | Re: Wasting our Freedom |
| Luke Bakken | Re: No Blob without Puffy |
| Julius Volz | [PATCHv3 19/24] IVPS: Disable sync daemon for IPv6 connections |
| Paul Moore | [RFC PATCH v4 04/14] selinux: Fix missing calls to netlbl_skbuff_err() |
| Dave Jones | odd RTL8139 quirk. |
| Patrick McHardy | [NET_SCHED 04/15]: act_api: use nlmsg_parse |
