<removed ksummit-2007-discuss@thunk.org as its subscriber only> On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 10:22:59AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > The elections for five of the ten members of the Linux Foundation > Technical Advisory Board[TAB] are held every year, currently the > election will be at the 2007 Kernel Summit in a BOF session. > > Anyone is eligible to stand for election, simply send your nomination > to: > > Tech-board-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org > > Only people invited to the kernel summit will be there in person (and > therefore able to vote), but if you cannot attend, your nomination email > will be read out before the voting begins. > > We currently have Three nominees: > > Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> > Greg Kroah Hartman <greg@kroah.com> > Christoph Lameter <christoph@lameter.com> > > The deadline for receiving nominations is up until the BOF where the > election is held (on the evening of either the 5th or 6th of September. > Although, please remember if you're not going to be present that things > go wrong with both networks and mailing lists, so get your nomination in > early). I have a reservation about voting for any of the above. Normally during any process involving votes, there exists some sort of "why you should vote for me" type statement. Does such a thing exist for this process ? Not that I've anything against any of the above candidates, but this should probably be more than just a popularity contest. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk -
| debian developer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 014/196] kobject: remove incorrect comment in kobject_rename |
| Vladislav Bolkhovitin | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Stephen Rothwell | Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-)) |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Radu Rendec | htb parallelism on multi-core platforms |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
