Re: tracking MAINTAINERS versus tracking SUBSYSTEMS

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Chris Snook
Date: Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - 12:22 pm

Joe Perches wrote:

I suppose.  I was thinking initially that directory parentage alone 
wouldn't suffice, because you could be traversing upwards from a variety 
of places with a complex patch.  But now that I think about it, a patch 
should really only be going in through one git tree, no matter how many 
subsystems it might peripherally touch.  Deciding which tree really 
requires human intelligence, so there's no point trying to automate 
that.  Multiple inheritance would be... bad...

	-- Chris
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
tracking MAINTAINERS versus tracking SUBSYSTEMS, Robert P. J. Day, (Sat Aug 18, 10:35 am)
Re: tracking MAINTAINERS versus tracking SUBSYSTEMS, Joe Perches, (Sat Aug 18, 5:32 pm)
Re: tracking MAINTAINERS versus tracking SUBSYSTEMS, Robert P. J. Day, (Sun Aug 19, 5:22 am)
Re: tracking MAINTAINERS versus tracking SUBSYSTEMS, Joe Perches, (Sun Aug 19, 8:37 am)
Re: tracking MAINTAINERS versus tracking SUBSYSTEMS, Krzysztof Halasa, (Sun Aug 19, 1:10 pm)
Re: tracking MAINTAINERS versus tracking SUBSYSTEMS, Chris Snook, (Mon Aug 20, 12:31 pm)
Re: tracking MAINTAINERS versus tracking SUBSYSTEMS, Joe Perches, (Mon Aug 20, 12:46 pm)
Re: tracking MAINTAINERS versus tracking SUBSYSTEMS, Chris Snook, (Tue Aug 21, 12:22 pm)