Re: [PATCH] ptrdiff_t is not uintptr_t, damnit

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: David Brownell
Date: Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - 11:53 am

On Sunday 19 August 2007, Al Viro wrote:

By the way:  ACK.  Glad there's now always a "uintptr_t".
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] ptrdiff_t is not uintptr_t, damnit, Al Viro, (Sun Aug 19, 3:55 pm)
Re: [PATCH] ptrdiff_t is not uintptr_t, damnit, David Brownell, (Sun Aug 19, 5:19 pm)
Re: [PATCH] ptrdiff_t is not uintptr_t, damnit, Anton Altaparmakov, (Sun Aug 19, 5:27 pm)
Re: [PATCH] ptrdiff_t is not uintptr_t, damnit, Anton Altaparmakov, (Sun Aug 19, 5:29 pm)
Re: [PATCH] ptrdiff_t is not uintptr_t, damnit, Al Viro, (Sun Aug 19, 5:52 pm)
Re: [PATCH] ptrdiff_t is not uintptr_t, damnit, Al Viro, (Sun Aug 19, 5:57 pm)
Re: [PATCH] ptrdiff_t is not uintptr_t, damnit, David Brownell, (Sun Aug 19, 5:57 pm)
Re: [PATCH] ptrdiff_t is not uintptr_t, damnit, David Brownell, (Sun Aug 19, 6:12 pm)
Re: [PATCH] ptrdiff_t is not uintptr_t, damnit, Satyam Sharma, (Sun Aug 19, 8:01 pm)
Re: [PATCH] ptrdiff_t is not uintptr_t, damnit, David Brownell, (Sun Aug 19, 8:26 pm)
Re: [PATCH] ptrdiff_t is not uintptr_t, damnit, Al Viro, (Sun Aug 19, 8:40 pm)
Re: [PATCH] ptrdiff_t is not uintptr_t, damnit, David Brownell, (Sun Aug 19, 9:17 pm)
Re: [PATCH] ptrdiff_t is not uintptr_t, damnit, David Brownell, (Tue Aug 21, 11:53 am)