Re: [PATCH 6/6] Do not use FASTCALL for __alloc_pages_nodemask()

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Mel Gorman
Date: Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - 3:25 am

On (18/08/07 14:51), Andi Kleen didst pronounce:

You're right. It now makes even less sense why it was a PPC64 machine that
exhibited the problem. It should have made no difference at all.

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 2/6] Use one zonelist that is filtered instead ..., Christoph Lameter, (Fri Aug 17, 1:59 pm)
Re: [PATCH 3/6] Embed zone_id information within the zonel ..., Christoph Lameter, (Fri Aug 17, 2:02 pm)
Re: [PATCH 4/6] Record how many zones can be safely skippe ..., Christoph Lameter, (Fri Aug 17, 2:03 pm)
Re: [PATCH 6/6] Do not use FASTCALL for __alloc_pages_node ..., Christoph Lameter, (Fri Aug 17, 2:07 pm)
Re: [PATCH 5/6] Filter based on a nodemask as well as a gf ..., Christoph Lameter, (Fri Aug 17, 2:29 pm)
Re: [PATCH 6/6] Do not use FASTCALL for __alloc_pages_node ..., Mel Gorman, (Tue Aug 21, 3:25 am)