Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Paul Mackerras
Date: Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - 2:33 am

Russell King writes:


Actually, no one is suggesting that we try to do that at all.

The discussion about RMW ops on MMIO space started with a comment
attributed to the gcc developers that one reason why gcc on x86
doesn't use instructions that do RMW ops on volatile variables is that
volatile is used to mark MMIO addresses, and there was some
uncertainty about whether (non-atomic) RMW ops on x86 could be used on
MMIO.  This is in regard to the question about why gcc on x86 always
moves a volatile variable into a register before doing anything to it.

So the whole discussion is irrelevant to ARM, PowerPC and any other
architecture except x86[-64].

Paul.
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently ac ..., Christoph Lameter, (Tue Aug 14, 4:14 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently ac ..., Segher Boessenkool, (Wed Aug 15, 11:31 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently ac ..., Paul E. McKenney, (Wed Aug 15, 11:57 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently ac ..., Segher Boessenkool, (Wed Aug 15, 1:47 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently ac ..., Segher Boessenkool, (Wed Aug 15, 1:52 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently ac ..., Segher Boessenkool, (Wed Aug 15, 2:05 pm)
[No subject], Satyam Sharma, (Wed Aug 15, 5:36 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently ac ..., Segher Boessenkool, (Wed Aug 15, 6:23 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently ac ..., Segher Boessenkool, (Wed Aug 15, 6:26 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently ac ..., Segher Boessenkool, (Wed Aug 15, 6:30 pm)
Re: , Segher Boessenkool, (Wed Aug 15, 6:38 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently ac ..., Segher Boessenkool, (Thu Aug 16, 12:32 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently ac ..., Segher Boessenkool, (Thu Aug 16, 12:33 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently ac ..., Paul E. McKenney, (Thu Aug 16, 10:18 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently ac ..., Geert Uytterhoeven, (Thu Aug 16, 11:42 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently ac ..., Segher Boessenkool, (Fri Aug 17, 10:37 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently ac ..., Segher Boessenkool, (Fri Aug 17, 3:29 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently ac ..., Segher Boessenkool, (Fri Aug 17, 3:49 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently ac ..., Segher Boessenkool, (Fri Aug 17, 4:55 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently ac ..., Christoph Lameter, (Fri Aug 17, 6:24 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently ac ..., Segher Boessenkool, (Mon Aug 20, 3:04 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently ac ..., Segher Boessenkool, (Mon Aug 20, 4:02 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently ac ..., Paul Mackerras, (Tue Aug 21, 2:33 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently ac ..., Segher Boessenkool, (Tue Aug 21, 7:39 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently ac ..., Segher Boessenkool, (Tue Aug 21, 7:48 am)
Re: [PATCH] i386: Fix a couple busy loops in mach_wakecpu. ..., Christoph Lameter, (Fri Aug 24, 10:06 am)