Re: [kvm-devel]

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Christian Borntraeger
Date: Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - 1:06 am

Am Montag, 20. August 2007 schrieb Glauber de Oliveira Costa:

I disagree here. First thing, you dont want to have the virtual cpu in a 
different process than the hypervisor control code for that cpu. Otherwise  
communication has to be made via IPC. 
Secondly, Its not qemu/kvm that does the accouting. Its existing userspace 
code like top/snmp agents and clients! etc. that would require additional 
knowledge which thread is guest code.

I personally like the approach Laurent has taken. Maybe it needs some polish 
and maybe we want an account_guest_time function, but in general I think he 
is doing the right thing. 

Christian
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Réf. : Re: [PATCH 0/4] Virtual Machine Time, laurent.vivier, (Mon Aug 20, 10:54 am)
Re: Réf. : Re: [PATCH 0/4] Vi, Glauber de Oliveira ..., (Mon Aug 20, 1:34 pm)
Re: , Laurent Vivier, (Tue Aug 21, 12:45 am)
Re: [kvm-devel] , Christian Borntraeger, (Tue Aug 21, 1:06 am)
Re: Réf. : Re: [PATCH 0/4] Vi, Glauber de Oliveira ..., (Tue Aug 21, 10:46 am)
Re: [kvm-devel] Réf. : Re: [PATCH 0, Glauber de Oliveira ..., (Tue Aug 21, 10:47 am)