Re: ck vs. cfs : realtime audio performance

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Carlo Florendo <subscribermail@...>
Cc: Lenar <lenar@...>, Klaus Schulz <Klaus.Schulz@...>, <ck@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Martin Steigerwald <Martin@...>
Date: Thursday, August 2, 2007 - 3:26 pm

* Carlo Florendo <subscribermail@gmail.com> wrote:


actually, there was no "SD ranting" going on at all. Klaus reported a 
problem, Martin forwarded it to me, i replied to it and Klaus gave me 
lots of debug info in a very professional way. So please calm down and 
lets get back to the tech topics, ok? (and i'd like to apologize here to 
Karl and Martin for the rough and unjust treatment they received on 
lkml.)

	Ingo
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: ck vs. cfs : realtime audio performance, Lenar Lõhmus, (Tue Jul 31, 8:54 am)
Re: ck vs. cfs : realtime audio performance, Carlo Florendo, (Thu Aug 2, 2:27 am)
Re: ck vs. cfs : realtime audio performance, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Aug 2, 3:26 pm)
Re: ck vs. cfs : realtime audio performance, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Aug 1, 2:31 am)