Re:

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Segher Boessenkool
Subject: Re:
Date: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 - 6:38 pm

>> "compilation unit" is a C standard term.  It typically boils down

Yeah.  "single .c file after preprocessing".  Same thing :-)


That would be a bit confusing, would it not?  They'd better find
some better name for that if they want to name it at all (remember,
none of these optimisations should have any effect on the semantics
of the program, you just get fewer .o files etc.).


Segher

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently ac ..., Christoph Lameter, (Tue Aug 14, 4:14 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently ac ..., Segher Boessenkool, (Wed Aug 15, 11:31 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently ac ..., Paul E. McKenney, (Wed Aug 15, 11:57 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently ac ..., Segher Boessenkool, (Wed Aug 15, 1:47 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently ac ..., Segher Boessenkool, (Wed Aug 15, 1:52 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently ac ..., Segher Boessenkool, (Wed Aug 15, 2:05 pm)
[No subject], Satyam Sharma, (Wed Aug 15, 5:36 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently ac ..., Segher Boessenkool, (Wed Aug 15, 6:23 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently ac ..., Segher Boessenkool, (Wed Aug 15, 6:26 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently ac ..., Segher Boessenkool, (Wed Aug 15, 6:30 pm)
Re: , Segher Boessenkool, (Wed Aug 15, 6:38 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently ac ..., Segher Boessenkool, (Thu Aug 16, 12:32 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently ac ..., Segher Boessenkool, (Thu Aug 16, 12:33 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently ac ..., Paul E. McKenney, (Thu Aug 16, 10:18 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently ac ..., Geert Uytterhoeven, (Thu Aug 16, 11:42 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently ac ..., Segher Boessenkool, (Fri Aug 17, 10:37 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently ac ..., Segher Boessenkool, (Fri Aug 17, 3:29 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently ac ..., Segher Boessenkool, (Fri Aug 17, 3:49 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently ac ..., Segher Boessenkool, (Fri Aug 17, 4:55 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently ac ..., Christoph Lameter, (Fri Aug 17, 6:24 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently ac ..., Segher Boessenkool, (Mon Aug 20, 3:04 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently ac ..., Segher Boessenkool, (Mon Aug 20, 4:02 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently ac ..., Segher Boessenkool, (Tue Aug 21, 7:39 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently ac ..., Segher Boessenkool, (Tue Aug 21, 7:48 am)
Re: [PATCH] i386: Fix a couple busy loops in mach_wakecpu. ..., Christoph Lameter, (Fri Aug 24, 10:06 am)