Re: kfree(0) - ok?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jason Uhlenkott
Date: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 - 1:52 am

On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 09:28:54 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:

Equality with the expression 0 is guaranteed.  Representation isn't.

http://www.c-faq.com/null/varieties.html
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: kfree(0) - ok?, Arjan van de Ven, (Tue Aug 14, 3:55 pm)
kfree(0) - ok?, Tim Bird, (Tue Aug 14, 3:59 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?, Satyam Sharma, (Tue Aug 14, 4:13 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?, Jason Uhlenkott, (Tue Aug 14, 4:21 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?, Satyam Sharma, (Tue Aug 14, 4:42 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?, Christoph Lameter, (Tue Aug 14, 5:19 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?, Jan Engelhardt, (Wed Aug 15, 12:28 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?, Rene Herman, (Wed Aug 15, 1:37 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?, Jason Uhlenkott, (Wed Aug 15, 1:52 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?, Andreas Schwab, (Wed Aug 15, 2:18 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?, Jan Engelhardt, (Wed Aug 15, 2:20 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?, Giacomo A. Catenazzi, (Wed Aug 15, 2:32 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?, Jason Uhlenkott, (Wed Aug 15, 2:43 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?, Rene Herman, (Wed Aug 15, 2:58 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?, Jan Engelhardt, (Wed Aug 15, 3:20 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?, Rene Herman, (Wed Aug 15, 3:27 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?, Kyle Moffett, (Wed Aug 15, 6:58 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?, Jan Engelhardt, (Wed Aug 15, 7:06 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?, Kyle Moffett, (Wed Aug 15, 7:34 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?, H. Peter Anvin, (Wed Aug 15, 9:01 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?, Andrew Morton, (Fri Aug 17, 11:22 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?, Arjan van de Ven, (Fri Aug 17, 11:31 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?, Jan Engelhardt, (Fri Aug 17, 11:37 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?, Satyam Sharma, (Fri Aug 17, 11:50 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?, Christoph Lameter, (Fri Aug 17, 1:43 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?, Satyam Sharma, (Fri Aug 17, 2:13 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?, Christoph Lameter, (Fri Aug 17, 2:14 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?, Satyam Sharma, (Fri Aug 17, 2:17 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?, Satyam Sharma, (Fri Aug 17, 2:32 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?, Pekka Enberg, (Fri Aug 17, 2:42 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?, Satyam Sharma, (Fri Aug 17, 2:46 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?, Christoph Lameter, (Fri Aug 17, 4:22 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?, Thomas Gleixner, (Fri Aug 17, 4:40 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?, Satyam Sharma, (Fri Aug 17, 5:02 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?, Christoph Lameter, (Fri Aug 17, 6:03 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?, Pekka Enberg, (Sat Aug 18, 1:10 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?, Jan Engelhardt, (Sat Aug 18, 1:21 am)