login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
August
»
15
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
Rene Herman <rene.herman@...>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...>
Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <jasonuhl@...>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...>, Tim Bird <tim.bird@...>, linux kernel <linux-kernel@...>
Subject:
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
Date: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 - 4:37 am
On 08/15/2007 09:28 AM, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
quoted text
> On Aug 14 2007 16:21, Jason Uhlenkott wrote:
quoted text
>> On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 15:55:48 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote: >>> NULL is not 0 though. >> It is. Its representation isn't guaranteed to be all-bits-zero, > > C guarantees that.
C guarantees what? If you're disagreeing with Jason -- he's right.
quoted text
>> but the constant value 0 when used in pointer context is always a >> null pointer (and in fact the standard requires that NULL be >> #defined as 0 or a cast thereof).
Rene. -
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
kfree(0) - ok?
, Tim Bird
, (Tue Aug 14, 6:59 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Satyam Sharma
, (Tue Aug 14, 7:13 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Arjan van de Ven
, (Tue Aug 14, 6:55 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Satyam Sharma
, (Tue Aug 14, 7:42 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Andrew Morton
, (Fri Aug 17, 2:22 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Satyam Sharma
, (Fri Aug 17, 5:13 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Christoph Lameter
, (Fri Aug 17, 5:14 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Satyam Sharma
, (Fri Aug 17, 5:46 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Pekka Enberg
, (Fri Aug 17, 5:42 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Thomas Gleixner
, (Fri Aug 17, 7:40 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Sat Aug 18, 4:21 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Pekka Enberg
, (Sat Aug 18, 4:10 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Christoph Lameter
, (Fri Aug 17, 9:03 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Satyam Sharma
, (Fri Aug 17, 8:02 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Christoph Lameter
, (Fri Aug 17, 7:22 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Christoph Lameter
, (Fri Aug 17, 4:43 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Satyam Sharma
, (Fri Aug 17, 5:17 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Satyam Sharma
, (Fri Aug 17, 5:32 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Fri Aug 17, 2:37 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Arjan van de Ven
, (Fri Aug 17, 2:31 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Satyam Sharma
, (Fri Aug 17, 2:50 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Christoph Lameter
, (Tue Aug 14, 8:19 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Jason Uhlenkott
, (Tue Aug 14, 7:21 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Wed Aug 15, 3:28 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Giacomo A. Catenazzi
, (Wed Aug 15, 5:32 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Andreas Schwab
, (Wed Aug 15, 5:18 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Jason Uhlenkott
, (Wed Aug 15, 4:52 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Rene Herman
, (Wed Aug 15, 4:37 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Wed Aug 15, 5:20 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Rene Herman
, (Wed Aug 15, 5:58 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Wed Aug 15, 6:20 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Wed Aug 15, 12:01 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Kyle Moffett
, (Wed Aug 15, 9:58 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Wed Aug 15, 10:06 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Kyle Moffett
, (Wed Aug 15, 10:34 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Rene Herman
, (Wed Aug 15, 6:27 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Jason Uhlenkott
, (Wed Aug 15, 5:43 am)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Greg KH
Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-))
Greg KH
[patch 26/73] NET: Correct two mistaken skb_reset_mac_header() conversions.
Greg Kroah-Hartman
[PATCH 007/196] Chinese: add translation of stable_kernel_rules.txt
Alan Cox
Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
git
:
linux-netdev
:
Alexey Dobriyan
Re: [GIT]: Networking
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 03/37] dccp: List management for new feature negotiation
Jarek Poplawski
[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Andrew Morton
Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs
openbsd-misc
:
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
4 users
and
1069 guests
online.
Online users
digitalcable
strcmp
zeekec
tommyconnery
Syndicate