login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
August
»
15
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...>
To: Jason Uhlenkott <jasonuhl@...>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...>, Tim Bird <tim.bird@...>, linux kernel <linux-kernel@...>
Subject:
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
Date: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 - 3:28 am
On Aug 14 2007 16:21, Jason Uhlenkott wrote:
quoted text
>On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 15:55:48 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote: >> NULL is not 0 though. > >It is. Its representation isn't guaranteed to be all-bits-zero,
C guarantees that.
quoted text
>but the constant value 0 when used in pointer context is always a >null pointer (and in fact the standard requires that NULL be >#defined as 0 or a cast thereof). >
Jan -- -
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
kfree(0) - ok?
, Tim Bird
, (Tue Aug 14, 6:59 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Satyam Sharma
, (Tue Aug 14, 7:13 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Arjan van de Ven
, (Tue Aug 14, 6:55 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Satyam Sharma
, (Tue Aug 14, 7:42 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Andrew Morton
, (Fri Aug 17, 2:22 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Satyam Sharma
, (Fri Aug 17, 5:13 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Christoph Lameter
, (Fri Aug 17, 5:14 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Satyam Sharma
, (Fri Aug 17, 5:46 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Pekka Enberg
, (Fri Aug 17, 5:42 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Thomas Gleixner
, (Fri Aug 17, 7:40 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Sat Aug 18, 4:21 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Pekka Enberg
, (Sat Aug 18, 4:10 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Christoph Lameter
, (Fri Aug 17, 9:03 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Satyam Sharma
, (Fri Aug 17, 8:02 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Christoph Lameter
, (Fri Aug 17, 7:22 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Christoph Lameter
, (Fri Aug 17, 4:43 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Satyam Sharma
, (Fri Aug 17, 5:17 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Satyam Sharma
, (Fri Aug 17, 5:32 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Fri Aug 17, 2:37 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Arjan van de Ven
, (Fri Aug 17, 2:31 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Satyam Sharma
, (Fri Aug 17, 2:50 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Christoph Lameter
, (Tue Aug 14, 8:19 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Jason Uhlenkott
, (Tue Aug 14, 7:21 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Wed Aug 15, 3:28 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Giacomo A. Catenazzi
, (Wed Aug 15, 5:32 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Andreas Schwab
, (Wed Aug 15, 5:18 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Jason Uhlenkott
, (Wed Aug 15, 4:52 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Rene Herman
, (Wed Aug 15, 4:37 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Wed Aug 15, 5:20 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Rene Herman
, (Wed Aug 15, 5:58 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Wed Aug 15, 6:20 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Wed Aug 15, 12:01 pm)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Kyle Moffett
, (Wed Aug 15, 9:58 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Wed Aug 15, 10:06 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Kyle Moffett
, (Wed Aug 15, 10:34 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Rene Herman
, (Wed Aug 15, 6:27 am)
Re: kfree(0) - ok?
, Jason Uhlenkott
, (Wed Aug 15, 5:43 am)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Artem Bityutskiy
[PATCH 10/44 take 2] [UBI] debug unit implementation
Greg Kroah-Hartman
[PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches
Trent Piepho
[PATCH] [POWERPC] Improve (in|out)_beXX() asm code
Dave Young
Re: Linux v2.6.24-rc1
git
:
linux-netdev
:
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side)
Linus Torvalds
Re: [GIT]: Networking
David Miller
Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Natalie Protasevich
[BUG] New Kernel Bugs
openbsd-misc
:
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
1 user
and
656 guests
online.
Online users
strcmp
Syndicate