Re: [patch 10/10] Scheduler profiling - Use immediate values

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Andi Kleen
Date: Friday, July 6, 2007 - 1:03 pm

On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 10:50:30AM -0700, Li, Tong N wrote:
                                                    ^^^^^^^

I meant L2 cache hit of course



I found that memory latency is difficult to measure in modern x86
CPUs because they have very clever prefetchers that can often
outwit benchmarks.

Another trap on P4 is that RDTSC is actually quite slow and synchronizes
the CPU; that can add large measurement errors.

-Andi

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch 10/10] Scheduler profiling - Use immediate values, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Tue Jul 3, 9:40 am)
Re: [patch 10/10] Scheduler profiling - Use immediate values, Alexey Dobriyan, (Tue Jul 3, 11:11 am)
Re: [patch 10/10] Scheduler profiling - Use immediate values, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Tue Jul 3, 11:57 am)
Re: [patch 10/10] Scheduler profiling - Use immediate values, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Thu Jul 5, 1:41 pm)
Re: [patch 10/10] Scheduler profiling - Use immediate values, Andi Kleen, (Fri Jul 6, 1:03 pm)
Re: [patch 10/10] Scheduler profiling - Use immediate values, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Fri Jul 6, 2:03 pm)
Re: [patch 10/10] Scheduler profiling - Use immediate values, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Fri Jul 6, 4:43 pm)
Re: [patch 10/10] Scheduler profiling - Use immediate values, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Fri Jul 6, 7:35 pm)
Re: [patch 10/10] Scheduler profiling - Use immediate values, Frank Ch. Eigler, (Sat Jul 7, 8:45 am)
Re: [patch 10/10] Scheduler profiling - Use immediate values, Frank Ch. Eigler, (Sat Jul 7, 10:55 am)
Re: [patch 10/10] *Tests* Scheduler profiling - Use immedi ..., Mathieu Desnoyers, (Tue Jul 10, 10:02 pm)