On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 02:35:39AM -0400, Darren wrote:It does not sound stupid and sounds good at first sight. But there are problems we've already seen with similar situations in different parts of the kernel: They would have different hardware support, features and bugs. And then a user user whose sound card is only supported by sound system A needs a feature only available in sound system B. And the quality decreases since people will often not report bugs in sound system A if sound system B works for them. OTOH, for a user it shouldn't matter whether there's OSS or ALSA, that's mostly a difference for application developers. And since (as you say) most applications already support both, there's no compelling reason for providing more than one of them. cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed -
| monstr | [PATCH 26/60] microblaze_v4: time support |
| Jon Smirl | Re: 463 kernel developers missing! |
| Andrew Morton | Re: x86: 4kstacks default |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jiri Olsa | [PATCHv5 0/2] net: fix race in the receive/select |
