Re: [PATCH 0/5] x86_64 EFI support -v3

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@...>
Cc: <ak@...>, <akpm@...>, Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...>, Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...>, Chandramouli Narayanan <mouli@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 - 12:47 am

"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> writes:


After reading through the patches.  I don't see any compelling
reason to use the efi runtime support.  It looks like we get
the interesting support for efi without out.  The graphics
and the memory map.  We have ACPI which already can do handle
this case.

Further the code has dead code sitting in the patches that you never
intend to use. EFI_MEMMAP.

The boot protocols are now out of sync for arch/i386 and arch/x86_64
for no obvious reason.

Using efi_set_virtual means kdump doesn't work which means that no
one is going to use this in a prebuilt kernel.

So mostly this patchset looks like a bad idea.

Eric
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 0/5] x86_64 EFI support -v3, Huang, Ying, (Mon Jul 30, 11:12 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] x86_64 EFI support -v3, Eric W. Biederman, (Tue Jul 31, 12:47 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] x86_64 EFI support -v3, Huang, Ying, (Mon Aug 6, 1:40 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] x86_64 EFI support -v3, Eric W. Biederman, (Wed Aug 8, 12:45 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] x86_64 EFI support -v3, Andi Kleen, (Wed Aug 8, 4:41 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] x86_64 EFI support -v3, Eric W. Biederman, (Tue Jul 31, 12:16 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] x86_64 EFI support -v3, Huang, Ying, (Tue Jul 31, 4:55 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] x86_64 EFI support -v3, Eric W. Biederman, (Wed Aug 1, 1:21 pm)