login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
July
»
30
Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [thread] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...>
To: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...>, Matthew Hawkins <darthmdh@...>, Jacob Braun <jwbraun@...>, kriko <kristjan.ugrin@...>, <ck@...>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-mm@...>, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...>
Subject:
Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?
Date: Monday, July 30, 2007 - 5:26 pm
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 12:53:41PM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
quoted text
> > Fuck you Martin! > > I think you meant to yell at Matthew, not Martin ;)
Yes, of course :) Also thanks to all the people pointing that out in private. -
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [thread] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.2...
, Matthew Hawkins
, (Mon Jul 30, 12:25 pm)
Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.2...
, Christoph Hellwig
, (Mon Jul 30, 2:29 pm)
Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?
, Roland Dreier
, (Mon Jul 30, 3:53 pm)
Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?
, Matthew Hawkins
, (Mon Jul 30, 11:07 pm)
Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?
, Adrian Bunk
, (Wed Aug 1, 1:25 am)
Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?
, Matthew Hawkins
, (Wed Aug 1, 2:19 am)
Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?
, Adrian Bunk
, (Wed Aug 1, 3:50 am)
Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?
, Christoph Hellwig
, (Tue Jul 31, 8:13 am)
Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?
, Martin Schwidefsky
, (Tue Jul 31, 3:01 am)
Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?
, Christoph Hellwig
, (Mon Jul 30, 5:26 pm)
Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.2...
, Arjan van de Ven
, (Mon Jul 30, 1:51 pm)
Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.2...
, Peter Zijlstra
, (Mon Jul 30, 12:50 pm)
Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.2...
, Kyle Rose
, (Mon Jul 30, 1:09 pm)
Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.2...
, Martin Schwidefsky
, (Mon Jul 30, 12:50 pm)
Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.2...
, Rashkae
, (Mon Jul 30, 12:58 pm)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Davide Libenzi
[patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
Greg Kroah-Hartman
[PATCH 018/196] coda: convert struct class_device to struct device
Bart Van Assche
Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel
David Newall
Re: Slow DOWN, please!!!
git
:
linux-netdev
:
Christoph Lameter
Network latency regressions from 2.6.22 to 2.6.29
David Miller
Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Arjan van de Ven
Re: [GIT]: Networking
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side)
openbsd-misc
:
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
0 users
and
711 guests
online.
Syndicate