Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...>, Matthew Hawkins <darthmdh@...>, Jacob Braun <jwbraun@...>, kriko <kristjan.ugrin@...>, <ck@...>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-mm@...>, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...>
Date: Monday, July 30, 2007 - 5:26 pm

On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 12:53:41PM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:

Yes, of course :)  Also thanks to all the people pointing that out
in private.
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.2..., Christoph Hellwig, (Mon Jul 30, 2:29 pm)
Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?, Roland Dreier, (Mon Jul 30, 3:53 pm)
Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?, Matthew Hawkins, (Mon Jul 30, 11:07 pm)
Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?, Adrian Bunk, (Wed Aug 1, 1:25 am)
Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?, Matthew Hawkins, (Wed Aug 1, 2:19 am)
Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?, Adrian Bunk, (Wed Aug 1, 3:50 am)
Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?, Christoph Hellwig, (Tue Jul 31, 8:13 am)
Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?, Martin Schwidefsky, (Tue Jul 31, 3:01 am)
Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?, Christoph Hellwig, (Mon Jul 30, 5:26 pm)
Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.2..., Martin Schwidefsky, (Mon Jul 30, 12:50 pm)