Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Kalpak Shah
Date: Tuesday, July 3, 2007 - 3:28 am

On Sun, 2007-07-01 at 03:36 -0400, Mingming Cao wrote:

This nanosecond patch seems to be missing the fix below which is required for http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5079

If the timestamp is set to before epoch i.e. a negative timestamp then the file may have its date set into the future on 64-bit systems. So when the timestamp is read it must be cast as signed.

Index: linux-2.6.21/include/linux/ext4_fs.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.21.orig/include/linux/ext4_fs.h
+++ linux-2.6.21/include/linux/ext4_fs.h
@@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ do {                                                                               \

 #define EXT4_INODE_GET_XTIME(xtime, inode, raw_inode)                         \
 do {                                                                          \
-       (inode)->xtime.tv_sec = le32_to_cpu((raw_inode)->xtime);               \
+       (inode)->xtime.tv_sec = (signed)le32_to_cpu((raw_inode)->xtime);       \
        if (EXT4_FITS_IN_INODE(raw_inode, EXT4_I(inode), xtime ## _extra))     \
                ext4_decode_extra_time(&(inode)->xtime,                        \
                                       raw_inode->xtime ## _extra);            \
@@ -399,7 +399,8 @@ do {                                                                               \
 #define EXT4_EINODE_GET_XTIME(xtime, einode, raw_inode)                               \
 do {                                                                          \
        if (EXT4_FITS_IN_INODE(raw_inode, einode, xtime))                      \
-               (einode)->xtime.tv_sec = le32_to_cpu((raw_inode)->xtime);      \
+               (einode)->xtime.tv_sec =                                       \
+                               (signed)le32_to_cpu((raw_inode)->xtime);       \
        if (EXT4_FITS_IN_INODE(raw_inode, einode, xtime ## _extra))            \
                ext4_decode_extra_time(&(einode)->xtime,                       \
                                       raw_inode->xtime ## _extra);            \


Thanks,
Kalpak.

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp, Mingming Cao, (Sun Jul 1, 12:36 am)
Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp, Aneesh Kumar K.V, (Mon Jul 2, 11:37 pm)
Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp, Kalpak Shah, (Tue Jul 3, 3:28 am)
Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp, Mingming Cao, (Tue Jul 3, 8:32 pm)
Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp, Aneesh Kumar K.V, (Tue Jul 3, 11:36 pm)
Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp, Aneesh Kumar K.V, (Wed Jul 4, 12:24 am)
Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp, Andreas Dilger, (Wed Jul 4, 9:44 am)
Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp, Andrew Morton, (Tue Jul 10, 4:30 pm)
Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp, Mingming Cao, (Tue Jul 10, 7:00 pm)
Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp, Andreas Dilger, (Wed Jul 11, 4:14 am)
Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp, Andreas Dilger, (Wed Jul 11, 4:28 am)
Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp, Kalpak Shah, (Thu Jul 12, 5:58 am)
Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp, Aneesh Kumar K.V, (Thu Jul 12, 9:29 pm)
Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp, Kalpak Shah, (Fri Jul 13, 12:05 am)
Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp, Mingming Cao, (Fri Jul 13, 2:46 pm)
Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp, Mingming Cao, (Mon Jul 16, 5:49 pm)
Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp, Kalpak Shah, (Tue Jul 17, 2:59 am)
Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp, Mingming Cao, (Tue Jul 17, 12:08 pm)