> * Kasper Sandberg <lkml@metanurb.dk> wrote:
quoted text
> > [...] As far as im concerned, i may be forced to unofficially maintain
> > SD for my own systems(allthough lots in the gaming community is bound
> > to be interrested, as it does make games lots better)

On 30/07/07, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
quoted text
> i'd encourage you to do it - in fact i already tried to prod Peter
> Williams into doing exactly that ;) The more reality checks a scheduler
> has, the better. [ Btw., after the obvious initial merging trouble it
> should be much easier to keep SD maintained against future upstream
> kernels due to the policy modularity that CFS introduces. (and which
> policy-modularity should also help reduce the size and complexity of the
> SD patch.) ]

<chuckle>

You're advocating plugsched now?
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/