On Sun, 2007-07-29 at 16:31 +0200, Diego Calleja wrote:
quoted text
> El Sat, 28 Jul 2007 18:00:39 -0700, Bill Huey (hui) <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org> escribió:
> 
> > The scheduler could have and still can undertake good solid transformation,
> > but getting folks to listen is another story which is why Con quit. CFS
> > basically locks him and his ideas out, not just from a technical stand
> 
> This is just wrong: AFAIK nobody is stopping Con or any other people from
> continuing developing SD or any other scheduler, and CFS certainly is subject
> to criticism. The idea that Linux can't use other innovative ideas in the scheduler
> is only in your mind.

Absolutely.

Con quit for his own reasons.  Given that Con himself has said that CFS
was _not_ why he quite, please discard this... bait.  Anyone who's name
isn't Con Kolivas, who pretends to speak for him is at the very least
overstepping his bounds, and that is being _very_ generous.

	-Mike

-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/