Op Saturday 28 July 2007, schreef Linus Torvalds:
<snip stuff i generally sagree with>
quoted text
>
> Compare this to SD for a while. Ponder.
>
> 			Linus

Your point here seems to be: this is how it went, and it was right. Ok, got=
=20
that. Yet, Con walked away (and not just over SD). Seeing Con go, I wonder=
=20
how many did leave without this splash. How many didn't even get involved a=
t=20
all??? Did THAT have to happen? I don't blame you for it - the point is tha=
t=20
somewhere in the process a valuable kernel hacker went away. How and why? A=
nd=20
is it due to a deeper problem?



=2D-=20
Disclaimer:

Alles wat ik doe denk en zeg is gebaseerd op het wereldbeeld wat ik nu heb.=
=20
Ik ben niet verantwoordelijk voor wijzigingen van de wereld, of het beeld w=
at=20
ik daarvan heb, noch voor de daaruit voortvloeiende gedragingen van mezelf.=
=20
Alles wat ik zeg is aardig bedoeld, tenzij expliciet vermeld.

Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

=A0 =A0A: Because it destroys the flow of the conversation
=A0 =A0Q: Why is top-posting bad?