Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Kasper Sandberg <lkml@...>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, CK Mailinglist <ck@...>
Date: Saturday, July 28, 2007 - 1:50 pm

On Sat, 28 Jul 2007, Kasper Sandberg wrote:

Ok, good. Has anybody tried to figure out why 3D games seem to be such a 
special case? 

I know Ingo looked at it, and seemed to think that he found and fixed 
something. But it sounds like it's worth a lot more discussion.


I don't _ever_ go on specialty mailing lists. I don't read -mm, and I 
don't read the -fs mailing lists. I don't think they are interesting. 

And I tried to explain why: people who concentrate on one thing tend to 
become this self-selecting group that never looks at anything else, and 
then rejects outside input from people who hadn't become part of the "mind 
meld". 

That's what I think I saw - I saw the reactions from where external people 
were talking and cc'ing me.

And yes, it's quite possible that I also got a very one-sided picture of 
it. I'm not disputing that. Con was also ill for a rather critical period, 
which was certainly not helping it all.


Hey, maybe that one incident just ended up being a rather big portion of 
what I saw. Too bad. That said, the end result (Con's public gripes about 
other kernel developers) mostly reinforced my opinion that I did the right 
choice.

But maybe you can show a better side of it all. I don't think _any_ 
scheduler is perfect, and almost all of the time, the RightAnswer(tm) ends 
up being not "one or the other", but "somewhere in between".

It's not like we've come to the end of the road: the baseline has just 
improved. If you guys can show that SD actually is better at some loads, 
without penalizing others, we can (and will) revisit this issue.

So what you should take away from this is that: from what I saw over the 
last couple of months, it really wasn't much of a decision. The difference 
in how Ingo and Con reacted to peoples reports was pretty stark. And no, I 
haven't followed the ck mailing list, and so yes, I obviously did get just 
a part of the picture, but the part I got was pretty damn unambiguous.

But at the same time, no technical decision is ever written in stone. It's 
all a balancing act. I've replaced the scheduler before, I'm 100% sure 
we'll replace it again. Schedulers are actually not at all that important 
in the end: they are a very very small detail in the kernel.

				Linus
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Sun Jul 22, 5:04 pm)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Ronni Nielsen, (Sat Jul 28, 10:52 am)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Sat Jul 28, 1:30 pm)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Kasper Sandberg, (Fri Jul 27, 10:04 pm)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Sun Jul 29, 11:04 am)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Kasper Sandberg, (Mon Jul 30, 12:13 pm)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, George Sescher, (Sun Jul 29, 7:04 pm)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Jul 30, 2:44 am)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, George Sescher, (Mon Jul 30, 3:06 am)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Jul 30, 3:55 am)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, George Sescher, (Mon Jul 30, 5:26 am)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Jul 30, 6:26 am)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Sun Jul 29, 7:18 pm)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Bill Huey, (Tue Jul 31, 6:05 am)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Tue Jul 31, 11:44 am)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Jul 31, 10:04 am)
Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Matthew Hawkins, (Mon Jul 30, 1:12 am)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, George Sescher, (Sun Jul 29, 7:38 pm)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Sun Jul 29, 7:58 pm)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Jul 27, 10:35 pm)
Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Jory A. Pratt, (Sat Jul 28, 5:07 pm)
Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Michael Chang, (Sat Jul 28, 9:18 am)
Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Sat Jul 28, 1:25 pm)
Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, jos poortvliet, (Sat Jul 28, 2:03 pm)
Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Sat Jul 28, 2:28 pm)
Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, jos poortvliet, (Sat Jul 28, 3:28 pm)
Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Sat Jul 28, 4:31 pm)
Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Roman Zippel, (Wed Aug 1, 12:17 am)
Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Carlo Florendo, (Wed Aug 1, 1:46 am)
RE: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Hua Zhong, (Wed Aug 1, 2:16 am)
Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Alan Cox, (Wed Aug 1, 8:31 am)
Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Carlo Florendo, (Wed Aug 1, 3:09 am)
Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Con Kolivas, (Sat Jul 28, 8:03 pm)
Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Charles philip Chan, (Sat Jul 28, 9:23 pm)
Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Bill Huey, (Sat Jul 28, 4:07 pm)
Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Diego Calleja, (Sat Jul 28, 5:06 pm)
Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Daniel Phillips, (Tue Aug 7, 2:55 am)
Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Alan Cox, (Tue Aug 7, 11:33 am)
Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Bill Huey, (Sat Jul 28, 5:32 pm)
Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Sat Jul 28, 6:18 pm)
Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Bill Huey, (Sat Jul 28, 9:00 pm)
Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Diego Calleja, (Sun Jul 29, 10:31 am)
Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Mike Galbraith, (Sun Jul 29, 4:25 pm)
Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Bill Huey, (Sun Jul 29, 5:48 pm)
Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Mike Galbraith, (Mon Jul 30, 1:03 am)
Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Martin Steigerwald, (Sun Jul 29, 2:31 pm)
Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Martin Steigerwald, (Sat Jul 28, 6:05 am)
Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Dirk Schoebel, (Sat Jul 28, 7:06 am)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Kasper Sandberg, (Sat Jul 28, 5:44 am)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Sat Jul 28, 1:50 pm)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Jan Engelhardt, (Sat Jul 28, 3:13 pm)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Sat Jul 28, 3:34 pm)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Jan Engelhardt, (Wed Aug 1, 5:21 am)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Sat Jul 28, 5:33 pm)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Jan Engelhardt, (Sat Jul 28, 5:55 pm)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Sat Jul 28, 6:22 pm)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Kasper Sandberg, (Sat Jul 28, 2:07 pm)
Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Matthew Hawkins, (Sat Jul 28, 3:36 am)
Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Martin Steigerwald, (Sat Jul 28, 6:40 am)
Reporting bugs (was Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1), Stefan Richter, (Sat Jul 28, 12:10 pm)
Re: Reporting bugs (was Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1), Michal Piotrowski, (Sat Jul 28, 12:21 pm)
Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Grzegorz Kulewski, (Sat Jul 28, 3:09 am)
SD still better than CFS for 3d , Kasper Sandberg, (Fri Jul 27, 7:43 am)
Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1), Kasper Sandberg, (Mon Jul 30, 7:46 pm)
Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1), Peter Zijlstra, (Tue Jul 31, 2:31 am)
Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1), J. Bruce Fields, (Thu Aug 2, 9:03 am)
Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1), Trond Myklebust, (Thu Aug 2, 9:39 am)
Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1), Kasper Sandberg, (Wed Aug 1, 7:43 pm)
Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1), Kasper Sandberg, (Wed Aug 8, 10:38 am)
2.6.23-rc1: BUG_ON in kmap_atomic_prot(), Alexey Dobriyan, (Mon Jul 23, 2:38 pm)
Re: 2.6.23-rc1: BUG_ON in kmap_atomic_prot(), Alexey Dobriyan, (Mon Jul 23, 3:01 pm)
Re: 2.6.23-rc1: BUG_ON in kmap_atomic_prot(), Andrew Morton, (Mon Jul 23, 4:24 pm)
Re: 2.6.23-rc1: BUG_ON in kmap_atomic_prot(), Mike Galbraith, (Tue Jul 24, 6:01 am)
Re: 2.6.23-rc1: BUG_ON in kmap_atomic_prot(), Andrew Morton, (Tue Jul 24, 12:28 pm)
Re: 2.6.23-rc1: BUG_ON in kmap_atomic_prot(), Linus Torvalds, (Tue Jul 24, 2:25 pm)
Re: 2.6.23-rc1: BUG_ON in kmap_atomic_prot(), Mike Galbraith, (Wed Jul 25, 1:09 am)
Re: 2.6.23-rc1: BUG_ON in kmap_atomic_prot(), Alexey Dobriyan, (Tue Jul 24, 4:05 pm)
Re: 2.6.23-rc1: BUG_ON in kmap_atomic_prot(), Cyrill Gorcunov, (Wed Jul 25, 1:44 pm)
Re: 2.6.23-rc1: BUG_ON in kmap_atomic_prot(), Mike Galbraith, (Tue Jul 24, 6:37 am)
Re: 2.6.23-rc1: BUG_ON in kmap_atomic_prot(), Alexey Dobriyan, (Mon Jul 23, 4:40 pm)
Re: 2.6.23-rc1: BUG_ON in kmap_atomic_prot(), Alexey Dobriyan, (Mon Jul 23, 5:01 pm)
Re: 2.6.23-rc1: BUG_ON in kmap_atomic_prot(), Andrew Morton, (Mon Jul 23, 5:11 pm)
Re: 2.6.23-rc1: BUG_ON in kmap_atomic_prot(), Alexey Dobriyan, (Mon Jul 23, 6:04 pm)
Re: 2.6.23-rc1: BUG_ON in kmap_atomic_prot(), Andrew Morton, (Mon Jul 23, 6:27 pm)
Re: 2.6.23-rc1: BUG_ON in kmap_atomic_prot(), Jens Axboe, (Tue Jul 24, 4:17 am)
Re: 2.6.23-rc1: BUG_ON in kmap_atomic_prot(), Jens Axboe, (Tue Jul 24, 4:22 am)
Re: 2.6.23-rc1: BUG_ON in kmap_atomic_prot(), Dan Williams, (Tue Jul 24, 9:55 am)
Re: 2.6.23-rc1: BUG_ON in kmap_atomic_prot(), Andrew Morton, (Tue Jul 24, 4:34 am)
Re: 2.6.23-rc1: BUG_ON in kmap_atomic_prot(), Dan Williams, (Tue Jul 24, 10:00 am)
Re: 2.6.23-rc1: BUG_ON in kmap_atomic_prot(), Alexey Dobriyan, (Tue Jul 24, 1:20 am)
Re: 2.6.23-rc1: BUG_ON in kmap_atomic_prot(), Linus Torvalds, (Mon Jul 23, 5:28 pm)
Re: 2.6.23-rc1: BUG_ON in kmap_atomic_prot(), Adrian Bunk, (Tue Jul 24, 1:59 pm)
Re: 2.6.23-rc1: BUG_ON in kmap_atomic_prot(), Linus Torvalds, (Tue Jul 24, 2:14 pm)
Re: 2.6.23-rc1: BUG_ON in kmap_atomic_prot(), Andrew Morton, (Tue Jul 24, 2:28 pm)
Re: 2.6.23-rc1: BUG_ON in kmap_atomic_prot(), Linus Torvalds, (Tue Jul 24, 3:15 pm)
Re: 2.6.23-rc1: BUG_ON in kmap_atomic_prot(), Adrian Bunk, (Tue Jul 24, 3:40 pm)
Re: 2.6.23-rc1: BUG_ON in kmap_atomic_prot(), Linus Torvalds, (Tue Jul 24, 3:48 pm)
Re: 2.6.23-rc1: BUG_ON in kmap_atomic_prot(), Adrian Bunk, (Thu Jul 26, 2:07 pm)
Re: 2.6.23-rc1: BUG_ON in kmap_atomic_prot(), Linus Torvalds, (Thu Jul 26, 2:19 pm)
Re: 2.6.23-rc1: BUG_ON in kmap_atomic_prot(), Andi Kleen, (Tue Jul 24, 4:27 pm)
Re: 2.6.23-rc1: BUG_ON in kmap_atomic_prot(), Linus Torvalds, (Tue Jul 24, 3:45 pm)
Re: 2.6.23-rc1: BUG_ON in kmap_atomic_prot(), Sam Ravnborg, (Mon Jul 23, 5:37 pm)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Gabriel C, (Mon Jul 23, 12:43 pm)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Ismail , (Mon Jul 23, 12:57 pm)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Alessandro Suardi, (Mon Jul 23, 4:44 pm)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Len Brown, (Tue Jul 24, 10:49 am)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, xen fix, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Jul 23, 11:52 am)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1: ACPI-related oops on x86_64, Mel Gorman, (Mon Jul 23, 5:50 am)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1: ACPI-related oops on x86_64, Len Brown, (Mon Jul 23, 1:15 pm)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1: ACPI-related oops on x86_64, Mel Gorman, (Tue Jul 24, 6:37 am)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Gabriel C, (Sun Jul 22, 10:48 pm)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Gabriel C, (Sun Jul 22, 9:20 pm)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Paul Mundt, (Sun Jul 22, 9:23 pm)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Greg KH, (Mon Jul 23, 12:11 am)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Gabriel C, (Sun Jul 22, 9:27 pm)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Paul Mundt, (Sun Jul 22, 9:40 pm)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Alistair John Strachan, (Sun Jul 22, 7:33 pm)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Roland McGrath, (Sun Jul 22, 7:51 pm)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Adrian Bunk, (Sun Jul 22, 8:07 pm)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Roland McGrath, (Sun Jul 22, 8:31 pm)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Adrian Bunk, (Sun Jul 22, 9:43 pm)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Andre Noll, (Sun Jul 22, 6:10 pm)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Andi Kleen, (Sun Jul 22, 6:22 pm)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Andre Noll, (Sun Jul 22, 7:23 pm)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Andi Kleen, (Sun Jul 22, 7:31 pm)
Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1, Jakub Jelinek, (Mon Jul 23, 2:07 am)