On Sat, 28 Jul 2007, Michael Chang wrote:
quoted text
> 
> I do recall there is one issue on which Con wouldn't budge -- anything
> that involved boosting certain kinds of processes in the kernel.

I did that myself, so that's a non-issue.

No. The complaints were about the CK scheduler not being as responsive 
under load as even the _old_ scheduler was. I don't know why people ignore 
this fact. It was a long thread back in March or April, and I'm pretty 
sure the CK mailing list was cc'd.

Sure, most people don't actually have load-averages above ten etc, but 
it's important to do those well _too_. 

			Linus
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/