On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 12:47:37AM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote:We can figure out ourselves when HOTPLUG_CPU is required, so there's no reason to bother the user with it. Yes, but a good user interface is worth it. Damn, I started thinking about it, and then forgot about it when finishing the patch. My thoughts were: Is HOTPLUG_CPU still an experimental feature, or has it become a well-tested no longer experimental feature now that it's used on most recent laptops? cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed -
| Heiko Carstens | [patch -mm] s390: struct bin_attribute changes |
| Andrew Morton | 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 |
| Eric W. Biederman | Re: [PATCH] kexec: force x86_64 arches to boot kdump kernels on boot cpu |
| Jan Engelhardt | intel iommu (Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jens Axboe | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| Andrew Morton | Re: [PATCH] PHYLIB: IRQ event workqueue handling fixes |
