Re: [PATCH][sas] Fix potential NULL pointer dereference bug in sas_smp_get_phy_events()

Previous thread: [PATCH] alpha: fix two section mismatch warnings by Sam Ravnborg on Friday, July 27, 2007 - 5:26 pm. (1 message)

Next thread: Lockdep violation in the serial driver by Alan Stern on Friday, July 27, 2007 - 5:33 pm. (1 message)
To: <linux-scsi@...>
Cc: Luben Tuikov <luben_tuikov@...>, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>, Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...>
Date: Friday, July 27, 2007 - 5:27 pm

Hello,

In sas_smp_get_phy_events() we never test if the call to
alloc_smp_req(RPEL_REQ_SIZE) succeeds or fails. That means we run
the risk of dereferencing a NULL pointer if it does fail. Far
better to test if we got NULL back and in that case return -ENOMEM
just as we already do for the other memory allocation in that
function.
This patch reworks the memory allocation a bit to deal with it
(compile tested only).

Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
---

drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c | 11 +++++++++--
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
index b500f0c..85f5145 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
@@ -507,14 +507,21 @@ static int sas_dev_present_in_domain(struct asd_sas_port *port,
int sas_smp_get_phy_events(struct sas_phy *phy)
{
int res;
+ u8 *req;
+ u8 *resp;
struct sas_rphy *rphy = dev_to_rphy(phy->dev.parent);
struct domain_device *dev = sas_find_dev_by_rphy(rphy);
- u8 *req = alloc_smp_req(RPEL_REQ_SIZE);
- u8 *resp = kzalloc(RPEL_RESP_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);

+ resp = kzalloc(RPEL_RESP_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!resp)
return -ENOMEM;

+ req = alloc_smp_req(RPEL_REQ_SIZE);
+ if (!req) {
+ res = -ENOMEM;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
req[1] = SMP_REPORT_PHY_ERR_LOG;
req[9] = phy->number;

PS. Please keep me on Cc when replying.

-

To: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...>
Cc: <linux-scsi@...>, Luben Tuikov <luben_tuikov@...>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Friday, July 27, 2007 - 7:02 pm

Just for the sake of being the same as all the rest of the code, the
sequence should be

req = alloc_smp_req(xxx_REQ_SIZE);
if (!req)
return -ENOMEM;

resp = alloc_smp_resp(xxx_RESP_SIZE);
if (!resp) {
kfree(req);
return -ENOMEM;
}

(allocate request then response).

It looks like disc_resp could use a little love too (it's using the req
alloc routines).

James

-

To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...>
Cc: <linux-scsi@...>, Luben Tuikov <luben_tuikov@...>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>, Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...>
Date: Friday, July 27, 2007 - 7:13 pm

Fair enough. It makes the code a bit larger though :

My way, as per the original patch:
text data bss dec hex filename
13820 0 8 13828 3604 drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.o
Your way, as per this patch:
text data bss dec hex filename
13832 0 8 13840 3610 drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.o

I hope this patch is acceptable :

In sas_smp_get_phy_events() we never test if the call to
alloc_smp_req(RPEL_REQ_SIZE) succeeds or fails. That means we run
the risk of dereferencing a NULL pointer if it does fail. Far
better to test if we got NULL back and in that case return -ENOMEM
just as we already do for the other memory allocation in that
function.
This patch should take care of it (compile tested only).

Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
---

drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c | 13 ++++++++++---
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
index b500f0c..e98d2b9 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
@@ -507,14 +507,21 @@ static int sas_dev_present_in_domain(struct asd_sas_port *port,
int sas_smp_get_phy_events(struct sas_phy *phy)
{
int res;
+ u8 *req;
+ u8 *resp;
struct sas_rphy *rphy = dev_to_rphy(phy->dev.parent);
struct domain_device *dev = sas_find_dev_by_rphy(rphy);
- u8 *req = alloc_smp_req(RPEL_REQ_SIZE);
- u8 *resp = kzalloc(RPEL_RESP_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);

- if (!resp)
+ req = alloc_smp_req(RPEL_REQ_SIZE);
+ if (!req)
return -ENOMEM;

+ resp = alloc_smp_resp(RPEL_RESP_SIZE);
+ if (!resp) {
+ kfree(req);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
req[1] = SMP_REPORT_PHY_ERR_LOG;
I'll take a look at that later.

--
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html

-
...

Previous thread: [PATCH] alpha: fix two section mismatch warnings by Sam Ravnborg on Friday, July 27, 2007 - 5:26 pm. (1 message)

Next thread: Lockdep violation in the serial driver by Alan Stern on Friday, July 27, 2007 - 5:33 pm. (1 message)