Re: solving(?) the updatedb problem w/ the kernel cache

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ray Lee
Date: Friday, July 27, 2007 - 9:42 am

On 7/27/07, Douglas J Hunley <doug@hunley.homeip.net> wrote:

inotify doesn't scale for lots of directories. I have about 18,000
directories under ~ on my laptop, and that's with a few source trees
that I use infrequently tarballed up.

But yes, if we had a full filesystem events notifier, then we could
just toss updatedb aside and have the benefit of a live index into the
system. It's been suggested before, at least by me. Other projects
want this as well, such as an on-demand virus scanner, or a live
backup to another site, or beagle/tracker who would like to index
documents on the fly. beagled already uses inotify, I think, but as it
takes over my system (in a bad way) whenever I tried to run it, I had
no choice but to remove it.

Perhaps it was choking on the 18k subdirectories, dunno.

Ray
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
solving(?) the updatedb problem w/ the kernel cache, Douglas J Hunley, (Fri Jul 27, 5:55 am)
Re: solving(?) the updatedb problem w/ the kernel cache, Ray Lee, (Fri Jul 27, 9:42 am)
Re: solving(?) the updatedb problem w/ the kernel cache, Michael Tharp, (Fri Jul 27, 10:09 am)
Re: solving(?) the updatedb problem w/ the kernel cache, Kevin Lindsay, (Fri Jul 27, 10:22 am)
Re: solving(?) the updatedb problem w/ the kernel cache, J. Bruce Fields, (Fri Jul 27, 10:24 am)