On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, Len Brown wrote:
quoted text
> 
> Feel free to share what you know about the benefits vs. the costs
> of maintaining CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP as a build option.

Why don't you just make CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP dependent on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND 
and STR?

quoted text
> If you feel that your system has been degraded
> because it now includes what used to be excluded under
> CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP=n, please let me know how.

I feel that I get asked to include a feature that 
 (a) I have no interest in on that machine
 (b) I didn't need to include before.

What was the advantage? And what was it that caused something like this to 
be a post-rc1 thing. That makes me really unhappy. This is a *regression*.

		Linus
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/