Re: Problems with timerfd()

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Ray Lee <ray-lk@...>
Cc: <drepper@...>, <davidel@...>, <torvalds@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <akpm@...>
Date: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 - 3:40 am

Ray,


The value returned by read() is the number of overruns since
the last read().


That's the point that the change is meant to address.


But userspace can't deal with the condition accurately, so why
require userspace to worry about this when we could just use
a 64-bit value instead?

Cheers,

Michael
-- 
Michael Kerrisk
maintainer of Linux man pages Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7 

Want to help with man page maintenance?  
Grab the latest tarball at
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/docs/manpages , 
read the HOWTOHELP file and grep the source 
files for 'FIXME'.

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Problems with timerfd(), Michael Kerrisk, (Mon Jul 23, 2:32 am)
Re: Problems with timerfd(), Ray Lee, (Mon Jul 23, 12:55 pm)
Re: Problems with timerfd(), Michael Kerrisk, (Tue Jul 24, 3:40 am)
Re: Problems with timerfd(), Ray Lee, (Tue Jul 24, 11:22 am)
Re: Problems with timerfd(), Michael Kerrisk, (Tue Jul 24, 11:56 am)
Re: Problems with timerfd(), Andrew Morton, (Mon Jul 23, 2:38 am)
Re: Problems with timerfd(), Michael Kerrisk, (Wed Jul 25, 2:18 pm)
Re: Problems with timerfd(), Andrew Morton, (Wed Jul 25, 6:12 pm)
Re: Problems with timerfd(), Michael Kerrisk, (Tue Aug 7, 2:55 am)
[PATCH] Revised timerfd() interface, Michael Kerrisk, (Thu Aug 9, 5:11 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Revised timerfd() interface , Jonathan Corbet, (Wed Aug 15, 10:40 am)
Re: [PATCH] Revised timerfd() interface, Randy Dunlap, (Mon Aug 13, 7:34 pm)
Re: Problems with timerfd(), Andrew Morton, (Tue Aug 7, 3:36 am)
Re: Problems with timerfd(), Michael Kerrisk, (Tue Aug 7, 5:14 am)
Re: Problems with timerfd(), Andrew Morton, (Mon Jul 23, 2:42 am)
Re: Problems with timerfd(), Michael Kerrisk, (Mon Jul 23, 4:02 am)