> Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> >
> > I have sanitized .tgz files that I use to stuff a Git repo with. I
> > recall that some of them were reconstructed through patching an earlier
> > or later kernel version because the original ones were corrupted. Some
> > patches were retrieved from other archival sites, etc. Then the result
> > was
> > cross checked with summary lists like this one:
> >
> >
http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0110.1/1684.html
> >
> > This was a while ago so I don't remember the exact steps, but that
> > wasn't always trivial.
> >
>
> Then there is 0.95a, 0.95c and 0.95c+, which as far as I know only ever
> existed as 0.95 + patches posted to alt.os.linux.
