Re: [PATCH] virtual sched_clock() for s390

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jan Glauber
Date: Monday, July 23, 2007 - 2:15 am

On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 09:22 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:

Using se.sum_exec_runtime to generate ->utime and ->stime breaks
the process accounting we have on s390 (and probably on PowerPC too).
With CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING we already have precise values in
->utime and ->stime. Can we make the calculation of the CFS-based time
values conditional by CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING?

Jan


-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] virtual sched_clock() for s390, Jan Glauber, (Thu Jul 19, 3:57 am)
Re: [PATCH] virtual sched_clock() for s390, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Thu Jul 19, 8:29 am)
Re: [PATCH] virtual sched_clock() for s390, Srivatsa Vaddagiri, (Thu Jul 19, 8:48 am)
Re: [PATCH] virtual sched_clock() for s390, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Jul 19, 9:00 am)
Re: [PATCH] virtual sched_clock() for s390, Jan Glauber, (Thu Jul 19, 12:20 pm)
Re: [PATCH] virtual sched_clock() for s390, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Jul 19, 12:38 pm)
Re: [PATCH] virtual sched_clock() for s390, Jan Glauber, (Thu Jul 19, 2:07 pm)
Re: [PATCH] virtual sched_clock() for s390, Paul Mackerras, (Thu Jul 19, 6:01 pm)
Re: [PATCH] virtual sched_clock() for s390, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Thu Jul 19, 11:03 pm)
Re: [PATCH] virtual sched_clock() for s390, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Jul 20, 12:22 am)
Re: [PATCH] virtual sched_clock() for s390, Jan Glauber, (Mon Jul 23, 2:15 am)
Re: [PATCH] virtual sched_clock() for s390, Martin Schwidefsky, (Mon Jul 23, 6:24 am)