On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 03:48:36PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > Some users may want NX > or expanded swapspace support without the overhead or instability of > highmem. NX is still going to need the larger PTEs, so I don't see how this change removes any 'overhead' or potential 'instability'. I'm not necessarily disagreeing with the change, but this part of the changelog seems to be false advertising. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk -
| Yu Zhao | [PATCH 2/16 v6] PCI: define PCI resource names in an 'enum' |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 011/196] sysfs: Fix a copy-n-paste typo in comment |
| Laurent Riffard | Re: 2.6.23-mm1: BUG in reiserfs_delete_xattrs |
| Ben Crowhurst | Kernel Development & Objective-C |
git: | |
| Kyle Rose | [OT] Re: C++ *for Git* |
| cte | linking libgit.a in C++ projects |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: CRLF problems with Git on Win32 |
| Pierre Habouzit | Re: [PATCH] bundle, fast-import: detect write failure |
| Thor Lancelot Simon | Re: sysctl knob to let sugid processes dump core (pr 15994) |
| YAMAMOTO Takashi | Re: Patches for EST and SMP |
| Bill Studenmund | Re: @booted_kernel magic symlink? |
| Adam Hamsik | Re: Thread benchmarks, round 2 |
| Chris | OpenBSD 4.4 installation error: write failed; file system full |
| Samuel Moñux | Cyrus IMAP performance problems [Long] |
| Steve B | Intel Atom and D945GCLF2 |
| James Hartley | scp batch mode? |
