login
Header Space

 
 

Re: [PATCH for review] [7/48] i386: divorce CONFIG_X86_PAE from CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...>
Cc: <wli@...>, <lkml@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Thursday, July 19, 2007 - 10:46 am

On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 03:48:36PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
 
 > Some users may want NX
 > or expanded swapspace support without the overhead or instability of
 > highmem. 

NX is still going to need the larger PTEs, so I don't see how this
change removes any 'overhead' or potential 'instability'.
I'm not necessarily disagreeing with the change, but this part
of the changelog seems to be false advertising.

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH for review] [26/48] i386: hpet assumes boot cpu i..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Thu Jul 19, 12:23 pm)
Re: [PATCH for review] [7/48] i386: divorce CONFIG_X86_PAE f..., Christoph Hellwig, (Thu Jul 19, 10:52 am)
Re: [PATCH for review] [7/48] i386: divorce CONFIG_X86_PAE f..., William Lee Irwin III, (Thu Jul 19, 8:45 pm)
Re: [PATCH for review] [7/48] i386: divorce CONFIG_X86_PAE f..., Dave Jones, (Thu Jul 19, 10:46 am)
Re: [PATCH for review] [11/48] x86_64: During VM oom conditi..., Christoph Hellwig, (Thu Jul 19, 10:04 am)
Re: [PATCH for review] [11/48] x86_64: During VM oom conditi..., Geert Uytterhoeven, (Thu Jul 19, 10:14 am)
Re: [PATCH respin, was PATCH for review] During VM oom condi..., Christoph Hellwig, (Tue Jul 24, 10:31 am)
speck-geostationary