Re: [PATCH try #3] security: Convert LSM into a static interface

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Alan Cox <alan@...>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@...>, Serge E. Hallyn <serge@...>, Christian Ehrhardt <lk@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Chris Wright <chrisw@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-security-module@...>, Stephen Smalley <sds@...>, Serge E. Hallyn <serue@...>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...>
Date: Thursday, July 19, 2007 - 9:30 am

On 7/19/07, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:

Code that is being debugged is, often [usually, I hope], out-of-tree
code, though it may be aimed at future inclusion.

However, I do agree that there is value to having loadable modules for
in-tree functionality, too.

scott
-- 
scott preece
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH try #3] security: Convert LSM into a static inter..., Christian Ehrhardt, (Thu Jul 19, 3:39 am)
Re: [PATCH try #3] security: Convert LSM into a static inter..., Arjan van de Ven, (Thu Jul 19, 12:54 pm)
Re: [PATCH try #3] security: Convert LSM into a static inter..., Christian Ehrhardt, (Thu Jul 19, 1:24 pm)
Re: [PATCH try #3] security: Convert LSM into a static inter..., Scott Preece, (Thu Jul 19, 9:30 am)