On 17/07/07, Bodo Eggert <7eggert@gmx.de> wrote:Ok, so perhaps a patch to do just that bit could go towards mainline (possibly after a short stay in -mm). Hmm, I guess it would make sense to stick it in -mm for an extended period of time, but hold off on mainline until we start hearing positive noises that people can no longer break 4K stacks... ;-) How about if I split it into two tiny patches - one that just makes it no longer a debug option and moves the option out of the "kernel hacking" submenu and into "general setup" instead, but leave it to default to N. - and then one that makes it default Y. and then submit those two patches to Andrew for inclusion in -mm with a clear note that only the first one should go upstream anytime soon and the second one should be kept "strictly -mm" until we arrive at the point in time where people can no longer break 4K. How does that sound? stacks some more testing and the indication that long-term that's the way we probably want to move. -- Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com> Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html -
| Fernando Luis | [PATCH] affinity is not defined in non-smp kernels - i386 (v2) |
| FUJITA Tomonori | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Tvrtko A. Ursulin | Out of tree module using LSM |
| Andi Kleen | [PATCH] [9/58] x86_64: Always use builtin memcpy on gcc 4.3 |
git: | |
| Dmitry Kakurin | Re: [RFC] Convert builin-mailinfo.c to use The Better String Library. |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: several quick questions |
| Scott Chacon | [PATCH] add a 'pre-push' hook |
| Junio C Hamano | Re: Change set based shallow clone |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| Paul Greidanus | Re: [Fwd: Open-Hardware] |
| Richard Daemon | Nfsen and php problems...? |
| Marco Peereboom | Re: Real men don't attack straw men |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| David Miller | Re: 2.6.25-rc8: FTP transfer errors |
| Steve Wise | pktgen question |
| James Bottomley | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
