Re: [2.6 patch] cleanup congestion control options

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>
Cc: <davem@...>, <netdev@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Saturday, July 14, 2007 - 12:59 am

On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 06:09:54 +0200, Adrian Bunk said:

Who decided whether a particular option is 'experimental' or not?

Lawrence S. Brakmo and Larry L. Peterson. TCP Vegas: end to end congestion
avoidance on a global Internet. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in
Communications, 13(8), October 1995.


I think the *right* fix here is '- depends on EXPERIMENTAL'.  1995. Geez. :)

(Probably *all* of the 'experimental' tags for congestion control need an in-depth
review - but Vegas struck me as particularly egregious.)
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[2.6 patch] cleanup congestion control options, Adrian Bunk, (Sat Jul 14, 12:09 am)
Re: [2.6 patch] cleanup congestion control options, David Miller, (Sat Jul 14, 2:54 am)
Re: [2.6 patch] cleanup congestion control options, Adrian Bunk, (Sat Jul 14, 3:10 am)
Re: [2.6 patch] cleanup congestion control options, , (Sat Jul 14, 12:59 am)