Re: x86 setup code rewrite in C - revised

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...>, <andi@...>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>
Date: Thursday, July 12, 2007 - 3:38 pm

On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 10:24:48AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:

The only thing questionable is that .code16gcc is arguably quite
an abuse of gcc. I even checked with some gcc developers 
and they weren't too happy about it. e.g. it's not regression
tested at all so we would be basically on our own with it.

But yes the code looks good.

-Andi

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
x86 setup code rewrite in C - revised, H. Peter Anvin, (Wed Jul 11, 3:18 pm)
Re: x86 setup code rewrite in C - revised, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Jul 12, 1:24 pm)
Re: x86 setup code rewrite in C - revised, Andi Kleen, (Thu Jul 12, 3:38 pm)
Re: x86 setup code rewrite in C - revised, Andrew Morton, (Thu Jul 12, 1:30 pm)
Re: x86 setup code rewrite in C - revised, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Jul 12, 1:49 pm)
Re: x86 setup code rewrite in C - revised, Jeff Garzik, (Wed Jul 11, 4:08 pm)
Re: x86 setup code rewrite in C - revised, H. Peter Anvin, (Wed Jul 11, 4:29 pm)
[x86 setup 02/33] hd.c: remove BIOS/CMOS queries, H. Peter Anvin, (Wed Jul 11, 3:18 pm)