On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:One thing I'll happily talk about is that while 2.6.21 was painful, you and Thomas in particular were both very responsible about the thing, so no, I'm not at all complaining or worried about it in that sense! I just really _really_ wish we could have two fairly stable releases in a row. I think 2.6.22 has the potential to be a pretty good setup, and I'd really like to avoid having another 2.6.21 immediately afterwards. So I'm not worried about integration and getting fixes when things break per se, but I *am* worried that this is an area where we've traditionally had lots of unexpected problems. And hey, maybe this time there will be none. I just still smart from the last time, so I'd prefer it to go more smoothly this time around. Linus -
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Zhang, Yanmin | AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1 |
| Andrew Morton | -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.27-rc5 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
