Re: queued spinlock code and results

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 - 10:26 pm

On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:


That would mean having to keep a lot of status information for a spinlock. 
Gets pretty complicated.

The RT tree already converts spinlocks to sleeping locks? If we want to be 
that complicated then maybe going with one sophisticated lock type for all 
would be the solution.
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
queued spinlock code and results, Nick Piggin, (Sun Jul 8, 12:32 am)
Re: queued spinlock code and results, Davide Libenzi, (Mon Jul 9, 3:01 pm)
Re: queued spinlock code and results, Linus Torvalds, (Mon Jul 9, 3:26 pm)
Re: queued spinlock code and results, Davide Libenzi, (Mon Jul 9, 3:47 pm)
Re: queued spinlock code and results, Linus Torvalds, (Mon Jul 9, 3:55 pm)
Re: queued spinlock code and results, Linus Torvalds, (Mon Jul 9, 4:08 pm)
Re: queued spinlock code and results, Davide Libenzi, (Mon Jul 9, 3:16 pm)
Re: queued spinlock code and results, Andi Kleen, (Sun Jul 8, 7:18 am)
Re: queued spinlock code and results, Christoph Lameter, (Tue Jul 10, 4:52 pm)
Re: queued spinlock code and results, Nick Piggin, (Tue Jul 10, 10:06 pm)
Re: queued spinlock code and results, Christoph Lameter, (Tue Jul 10, 10:26 pm)
Re: queued spinlock code and results, Nick Piggin, (Wed Jul 11, 12:51 am)
Re: queued spinlock code and results, Linus Torvalds, (Sun Jul 8, 12:49 pm)
Re: queued spinlock code and results, Nick Piggin, (Sun Jul 8, 6:40 am)