Jeremy Maitin-Shepard wrote:That sounds very fragile. It would be better to extend the bootparams to contain that information. 2MB for x86, I think. But that's not really an issue if you use a P(seudo-physical) to M(achine) mapping, since you can choose any arrangement you like for the kernel. The only restriction is that you can't use large pages any more, but I don't think that's an issue for a dump/hibernation kernel. Well, the traditional framebuffer/ISA space between 640k and 1M probably needs to be identity mapped, but I don't think there's anything in there which specifically needs to be save/restored (except framebuffer contents, maybe?). Yes, I suppose. You're certain the old kernel's devices are completely quiescent at that point? J -
| Peter Zijlstra | [RFC][PATCH 7/7] lockdep: spin_lock_nest_lock() |
| Gabriel C | Re: 2.6.24-rc2-mm1 |
| Andrew Morton | Re: [PATCH 2.6.21] cramfs: add cramfs Linear XIP |
| Jiri Kosina | Re: 2.6.21-rc5-mm4 |
git: | |
| Gregory Haskins | [RFC PATCH 00/17] virtual-bus |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 0/37] dccp: Feature negotiation - last call for comments |
