On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 07:11:03PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:You're delusional. http://www.kernel.org/hg/linux-2.6/annotate/tip/mm/slob.c A grand total of 15 lines accounted to you, all of which are completely trivial. Most of them are turning no-op macros into no-op but non-inline functions. Not an improvement. Reverting that now on my todo list, thanks for drawing my attention to it. The remainder is just churn from your SLUB work. While you're at it, note the lines from Dimitri, quickly fixing the breakage you introduced. Count many more lines from Nick, Pekka, and Akinobu making useful changes. And note that all three of the real bugs fixed were fairly hard to hit. It's unlikely that anyone would have ever hit the RCU bug. The find_order bug only hit allocations of unlikely sizes like 8193 bytes. And SLAB_PANIC triggering is fairly unheard of, and simply makes the kernel crash slightly sooner anyway. The only remaining known bug is arguably a problem in nommu that SLOB shouldn't be papering over. That's pretty damn stable compared to the other allocators in the kernel. Um.. would those be the same kernel standards you pulled out of your ass to argue SLOB shouldn't exist? -- Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time. -
| James Bottomley | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 007/196] Chinese: add translation of stable_kernel_rules.txt |
| david | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Jan Engelhardt | intel iommu (Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
git: | |
| Alexey Dobriyan | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
