Re: kernel/module.c warning re: non-GPL modules looks wrong

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@...>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Saturday, June 9, 2007 - 12:24 pm

On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 05:25:08AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
EXPORT_GPL_FUTURE is used to mark _functionality_ as no longer available
after a grace period. So when one marks a set of symbols as GPL_FUTURE
that functionality ougt to be described in feature-removal.
Did you see any _functionaliy_ where GPL_FUTURE are used where it
is not warned in fetaure-removal that that _functionality_ are supposed
to be changed?

Or in other words - please be more specific.

	Sam
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
kernel/module.c warning re: non-GPL modules looks wrong, Robert P. J. Day, (Sat Jun 9, 5:25 am)
Re: kernel/module.c warning re: non-GPL modules looks wrong, Sam Ravnborg, (Sat Jun 9, 12:24 pm)