On Wed, 6 Jun 2007, Michael Hanselmann wrote:

quoted text
> > So the system is behaving the way you want, but not for the reason you 
> > think.  I bet you could remove the call to usb_root_hub_lost_power() 
> > entirely and it wouldn't make any difference at all.
> 
> Actually, that's true. René Nussbaumer tried without that call and it
> still works as intended. Should I leave that call out and drop the
> changes on usb_root_hub_lost_power for CONFIG_PM?

That would be best.  usb_root_hub_lost_power() is really meant to be 
used only when resuming from a suspend; it isn't appropriate for your 
situation.

Alan Stern

-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/