On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, David Rientjes wrote:

quoted text
> Obviously GFP_KERNEL allocations can allocate regardless of our memory 
> exclusivity, but the point is that a job in one exclusive cpuset should 
> not have the ability to effect the performance (in terms of reclaim and 
> swap), memory usage, or survival of jobs in other exclusive cpusets 
> because it was out of memory.

Right but the process is terminating thus only requiring limited resources
to get finished. The process does not have the ability to affect the other 
cpusets. I.e. it cannot directly allocate outside of the cpuset. The 
system has that capability and the system is handling the termination of 
the process and should terminate the process in a clean way if possible.

quoted text
> > Processes stuck in D state is another issue with reliability.
> But it's a reality that we need to respect.  It happens and when it does
> it has the potential to hamper other cpusets that we setup to be exclusive 
> themselves.

The fact that process hang because of some software deficiency is an 
exceptional failure scenario. The system in general is not fully 
operational anymore anyways. Typically one or the other lock is held which 
makes certain kernel functionality inaccessible.

-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/