Alan Cox wrote:
quoted text
> On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:10:49 -0400
> Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> wrote:
> 
>> Alan Cox wrote:
>>>>> I'm not even sure this report is IT8212 related rather than just an IRQ
>>>>> storm
>>>> Why does the driver report "irq 0"?
>>>>
>>>> ata7: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd <blah> ctl <blah> bmdma <blah> irq 0  <====
>>>>
>>>> Above that, the ACPI layer says it assigned IRQ 20
>>> Because the libata core code in 2.6.22rc6 reports all the ports and IRQ
>>> values wrongly ?
>> AFAIK that was fixed, for IRQ.  Please point out examples where it 
>> remains broken...
> 
> 2.6.22-rc6 it is broken, for all the systems I've looked at, as are the
> port numbers. Tejun posted fixes for the IRQ but they do not seem to have
> been applied, or if they were it was post -rc6 to a git tree.


I've seen the patch that eventually became 
22888423b3b1b96573250671afb5b72ea4364902 from Olof Johansson but nothing 
from Tejun on the subject.

	Jeff


-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/