On 6/28/07, Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> wrote:
quoted text
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 03:05:56PM -0700, Joshua Wise wrote:
> > --- a/arch/x86_64/kernel/process.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86_64/kernel/process.c
> > @@ -356,6 +356,7 @@ void show_regs(struct pt_regs *regs)
> >       printk("CPU %d:", smp_processor_id());
> >       __show_regs(regs);
> >       show_trace(NULL, regs, (void *)(regs + 1));
> > +     atomic_notifier_call_chain(&info_dumper_list, 0, NULL);
> >  }
> >
>
> woah woah woah. This could push critical bits of the register dump or
> stacktrace off the screen... Barring any other problems with the patch,
> this should probably be dumped in the oops header, not trailing it where
> it could hide critical debugging info.

on the flip side, poorly written chained funcs could oops thus
preventing the good info (like stacktrace) from being shown ...
-mike
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/