On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 11:47:04 +0200 Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote:

quoted text
> On Thursday 28 June 2007 11:42:33 Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> > > The patch set has been tested in the -hrt and -rt trees for quite a while
> > > and the initial problems have been sorted out. Thanks to the folks from the
> > > PowerTop project for testing and feedback.
> > 
> > hrm.  Looks like none of your testers have HPET_ID_LEGSUP hardware.  
> 
> AFAIK it's only on IBM Summit. You have such a box?

Intel Nocona SDV thing.  Old.

quoted text
> > btw, if you want to know why I go on and on about crappy commenting, try to
> > work out from the kernel source code what HPET_ID_LEGSUP is, and why it
> > gets special treatment.  It is not possible.  This is not maintainable
> > code.
> 
> We have a reference somewhere to the HPET spec.

The HPET spec won't tell me why HPET_ID_LEGSUP hpets get a kmalloc in Linux
but the !HPET_ID_LEGSUP ones don't.

-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/