Re: libata and legacy ide pcmcia failure

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Albert Lee
Date: Monday, June 25, 2007 - 3:15 am

Robert de Rooy wrote:

The patch just workarounds the "lost irq" problem by polling; not real
fix. We still need to find out why irq is lost per Mark's comment:

"This proves that the device does work correctly in most respects
except for interrupt delivery.  The status bits are working and
it can be probed for, configured, and used."

"So, next step might be to try and understand the interrupt mis-delivery
problem some more.   I've lost the history of the original issue,
but we now know that everything except the actual interrupt seems good."

I am not familiar with the PCMCIA interrupt delivery. It seems the
"Dazzle 4in1 Card Adapter" works under windows but somehow lost irq
under both IDE and libata. Maybe Alan/Bart or the PCMCIA developers
know better...
--
albert

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: libata and legacy ide pcmcia failure, Robert de Rooy, (Mon Jun 11, 3:36 pm)
Re: libata and legacy ide pcmcia failure, Mark Lord, (Mon Jun 11, 3:40 pm)
Re: libata and legacy ide pcmcia failure, Tejun Heo, (Mon Jun 11, 8:24 pm)
Re: libata and legacy ide pcmcia failure, Albert Lee, (Tue Jun 12, 6:36 pm)
Re: libata and legacy ide pcmcia failure, Tejun Heo, (Thu Jun 14, 2:39 am)
Re: libata and legacy ide pcmcia failure, Robert de Rooy, (Fri Jun 22, 4:51 am)
Re: libata and legacy ide pcmcia failure, Mark Lord, (Fri Jun 22, 6:32 am)
Re: libata and legacy ide pcmcia failure, Albert Lee, (Sun Jun 24, 9:04 pm)
Re: libata and legacy ide pcmcia failure, Robert de Rooy, (Mon Jun 25, 2:31 am)
Re: libata and legacy ide pcmcia failure, Albert Lee, (Mon Jun 25, 3:15 am)