Al Viro wrote:-

quoted text
> > See gcc.gnu.org/PR456 for more discussion.  Yes it's an old
> > bug...
> 
> Humm...  Right, so __builtin_offsetof() needs special treatment too.
> Oh, bugger.  Is
> 	offsetof(struct foo, a.x[n])
> a documented extension?  I _know_ that it's not promised by 7.17,
> but gcc eats it (and obviously that sucker requires extra treatment
> in that case).

I asked on comp.std.c about this; the feeling was that only identifiers
are intended to be permitted as the 2nd argument to offsetof.  If true
the standard has a very obscure way of stating something that could
be said much more simply.
 
quoted text
> Parsing __builtin_offsetof() arguments is going to be fun ;-/  Right
> now sparse has it as a predefined macro, but if we want to do that
> kind of analysis, we need to really parse it.  OTOH, that's not
> such a big deal...  Parser would need to accept
> 	ident ( \[ expr \] | . ident )*

don't forget -> if you're going to accept extra stuff.  GCC forgot ->
with the parser rewrite, yes I filed a PR.

Neil.
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/