>On Friday 22 June 2007 13:02:26 Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> In fact, I suspect pretty much any documentation (whether technical or
>> about processes and/or style) makes sense to have translated if the energy
>> and ability to do that exists. I suspect the "policies and processes"
>> kinds of docs make _more_ sense to translate initially, simply because
>> they are approachable on their own - but I certainly would never
>> discourage anybody from translating anything at all.
>>
>> That said, I don't think that merging the result into the standard kernel
>> makes sense - like it or not, right now English ends up being required
>> to be part of actually getting things into the "standard" kernel, and as
>> such, at _some_ point there has to be a connection point that switches
>> over to English, and trying to make the translations be an in-kernel thing
>> is thus kind of pointless.
>>
>> But as part of some "documentation site", it makes 100% sense.
>
>Ok, I've got some documentation site, specifically
http://kernel.org/doc (and
>I'll be completely redoing it as soon as I've recovered from my recent laptop
>crash and OLS).
>
>Send me translations (preferably in HTML format), and I'll put 'em up. (I've
>already got the one that started this thread.)
>
>Thanks,
>
